IGF (Independent Growth Finance) vs Touch Financial: UK Invoice Finance Comparison 2026
IGF (Independent Growth Finance) edges this one in our 2026 UK review at 4.1 of 5 against 4.0 for Touch Financial. Both are UK independent invoice finance providers, freer than banks on covenants and faster on decisioning. The difference is sector specialism, headline rate and minimum turnover floor. IGF (Independent Growth Finance) advances up to 90% receivables + stock + plant with setup in 10 working days; Touch Financial advances up to 90% (funder dependent) with setup in 3 to 10 working days. Touch Financial still wins where smes wanting one application sent to several funders matters more than the headline score. Read the side-by-side, then check the "when X wins" sections for the buyer-fit logic.
Side-by-side
| IGF (Independent Growth Finance) | Touch Financial | |
|---|---|---|
| Cluster | independent | independent |
| Product type | Invoice finance (ABL, CID), asset-based lending | Invoice finance broker (whole-of-market) |
| Min turnover | £500k | Varies by funder |
| Advance rate | Up to 90% receivables + stock + plant | Up to 90% (funder dependent) |
| Typical fee | Bespoke pricing | Funder rates; no broker fee to client |
| Contract / commitment | Whole-ledger or selective | Whole-ledger or selective |
| Confidential available? | Yes | Yes |
| Factoring available? | Yes | Yes |
| Setup speed | 10 working days | 3 to 10 working days |
| Best for | Mid-market £5m-£50m turnover; Complex ABL needs (receivables + stock); Turnaround and restructure cases | SMEs wanting one application sent to several funders; Businesses unsure which lender fits; Comparison-led buyers |
| Overall rating | 4.1 / 5 | 4.0 / 5 |
| Last reviewed | 2026-05-12 | 2026-05-27 |
When IGF (Independent Growth Finance) wins
- ABL specialist: receivables + stock + plant under one facility.
- Mid-market deals to £25m, where monoline IF lenders cap out.
- Flexible covenant negotiation.
- Established mid-market reputation since 2001.
Best for
Mid-market £5m-£50m turnover, Complex ABL needs (receivables + stock), Turnaround and restructure cases.
Watch outs
- Pricing bespoke, not transparent in marketing.
- Setup 10 days, slower than monoline IF.
- £500k+ minimum excludes smaller SMEs.
When Touch Financial wins
- Whole-of-market brokering across a panel of UK invoice finance lenders.
- No fee charged to the client; commission paid by the funder.
- Single application routed to multiple providers for comparison.
- Handles factoring, confidential discounting and selective facilities.
Best for
SMEs wanting one application sent to several funders, Businesses unsure which lender fits, Comparison-led buyers.
Watch outs
- A broker, not a lender, so it does not set rates or underwrite directly.
- Final terms and speed depend entirely on the chosen funder.
- Panel may not include every UK provider.
FAQ
IGF (Independent Growth Finance) or Touch Financial: which is the better UK invoice finance provider in 2026?
IGF (Independent Growth Finance) scores higher overall in our 2026 review at 4.1 of 5 versus 4.0 for Touch Financial. That headline does not settle the answer though. IGF (Independent Growth Finance) is the stronger pick for mid-market £5m-£50m turnover; Touch Financial is the stronger pick for smes wanting one application sent to several funders. If your business fits one of those use cases, ignore the rating and pick the right fit.
What are the headline commercials, IGF (Independent Growth Finance) vs Touch Financial?
IGF (Independent Growth Finance) advances up to 90% receivables + stock + plant at bespoke pricing. Touch Financial advances up to 90% (funder dependent) at funder rates; no broker fee to client. Minimum turnover is £500k for IGF (Independent Growth Finance) and Varies by funder for Touch Financial. Setup runs 10 working days for IGF (Independent Growth Finance) and 3 to 10 working days for Touch Financial. Bespoke pricing is common above £1m ledger so verify before signing.
Can I get a confidential facility with either IGF (Independent Growth Finance) or Touch Financial?
IGF (Independent Growth Finance) offers confidential invoice discounting (your customers are not notified). Touch Financial offers confidential invoice discounting. If your customer relationships make disclosure a non-starter, that determines the answer regardless of headline rate.
Where does each one struggle?
IGF (Independent Growth Finance) is the wrong fit for sub-£500k turnover. Touch Financial is the wrong fit for businesses wanting a direct lender relationship. If either describes your business, browse the side-by-side or get matched against the wider UK panel via our quote form.
Can Market Invoice help me choose between IGF (Independent Growth Finance) and Touch Financial?
Yes. We are an independent UK invoice finance comparison operated by Best Business Loans Ltd (16833937). We are not tied to either provider. Tell us monthly turnover, sector, debtor profile and whether you need the facility confidential. We match you against the UK invoice finance providers most likely to approve at a competitive rate, then stay your editorial reference for life.
Related
- Full IGF (Independent Growth Finance) review
- Full Touch Financial review
- Close Brothers Invoice Finance vs Ultimate Finance
- Aldermore Invoice Finance vs Close Brothers Invoice Finance
- Allianz Trade vs Close Brothers Invoice Finance
- All UK invoice finance comparisons
- Browse every reviewed UK invoice finance provider
- UK invoice finance by region
Get matched in two minutes
Tell us monthly turnover, sector, debtor profile and whether the facility needs to be confidential. We match you against the UK invoice finance providers most likely to approve at a competitive rate, then stay your editorial reference for life.
Get quotes →Reviewed by Oliver Mackman, Director. Last reviewed: 2026-05-27. Editorial by Best Business Loans Ltd (16833937).