Invoice Factoring vs Asset Finance
Invoice factoring and asset finance solve different problems. Factoring releases cash from your unpaid invoices (working capital), while asset finance funds the purchase of equipment, vehicles, or machinery (capital expenditure). They are not alternatives — many businesses use both. The key question is which problem you need to solve first: cash flow gaps or capacity constraints.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Feature | Invoice Factoring | Asset Finance |
|---|---|---|
| Purpose | Working capital / cash flow | Equipment / vehicle purchase |
| How it works | Advance against unpaid invoices | Spread cost of asset over 1-7 years |
| Typical cost | 0.5-3% service + interest on advance | 3-10% APR fixed |
| Repayment | Automatic when customer pays | Fixed monthly over term |
| Security | Your invoices | The asset itself |
| Scales with growth? | Yes — more invoices = more funding | No — fixed to asset value |
| Tax benefits | Fees are tax deductible | Capital allowances + lease deductions |
| Best for | B2B businesses with slow-paying customers | Businesses needing equipment/vehicles |
When to Use Both Together
A construction company is a good example. They need asset finance for excavators and vehicles, and invoice factoring to fund the gap between completing work and getting paid by the main contractor. The two products work on completely different parts of the balance sheet and complement each other.
Providers like Close Brothers, Bibby, and Novuna offer both products and will often give a pricing discount when you take a combined facility.
Oliver Mackman
Director, Market Invoice
Oliver leads Market Invoice's editorial and comparison research. With a background in UK commercial finance, he oversees provider analysis, rate verification, and industry reporting across all verticals.
Last reviewed: 5 April 2026